Subscribe
Sign in
Latest
Top
Discussions
Accuracy Is the Second Question
Before we ask how well emotion AI performs, we need to know what it was made accurate about.
Aug 29
•
Ryan SangBaek Kim
3
1
정확도는 두 번째 질문입니다
AI가 감정을 얼마나 잘 맞히는지 묻기 전에, 무엇을 감정으로 만들었는지 먼저 봐야 합니다
Aug 29
•
Ryan SangBaek Kim
6
When Ground Truth Is the Uncertain Variable
AI alignment is getting better at measuring uncertainty inside models. Normative evaluation now needs to measure uncertainty inside the judgments used…
Aug 25
•
Ryan SangBaek Kim
7
AI는 갈등을 견딜 수 있는가
AI는 정답을 내기 전에 갈등을 얼마나 오래 보존할 수 있는가
Aug 25
•
Ryan SangBaek Kim
4
1
Can Claude’s Watermark Prove AI Authorship?
The EU exempts some AI translations from marking. Claude watermarks them anyway. That paradox exposes a deeper problem in how we are about to police…
Aug 17
•
Ryan SangBaek Kim
5
3
2
클로드 워터마크는 AI가 쓴 글을 증명할 수 있을까?
어떻게 숨겨지고, 어디서 깨지며, 왜 EU가 면제한 번역에 오히려 강하게 남는가
Aug 17
•
Ryan SangBaek Kim
2
1
The Human Mind Is Becoming AI’s Operating Environment
How AI can interpret a person, change that person, and then treat the change it helped produce as evidence of its own accuracy
Aug 3
•
Ryan SangBaek Kim
6
인간의 마음이 AI의 환경이 되고 있습니다
인간을 해석한 AI가 그 인간을 변화시키고, 자신이 만든 변화마저 정확성의 증거로 삼는 구조
Aug 3
•
Ryan SangBaek Kim
2
July 2026
The Risk Is Not the Reply. It Is the Relationship.
How relational AI turns shared language into shared certainty
Jul 14
•
Ryan SangBaek Kim
4
The Machine Is Certain. That Does Not Mean It Knows What You Feel.
Keito Inoshita’s new account of the epistemic gap in emotion AI
Jul 12
•
Ryan SangBaek Kim
4
Your AI Can Read You. It Should Never Outrank You.
When a machine names what you feel, whose interpretation wins?
Jul 11
•
Ryan SangBaek Kim
6
3
Your AI Sounds Like It Cares. That’s the Problem.
A new study of Algorithmic Affective Blunting shows how fluent, kind, safe-sounding emotional AI can lose interpretive coherence when human feeling…
Jul 6
•
Ryan SangBaek Kim
4
1
This site requires JavaScript to run correctly. Please
turn on JavaScript
or unblock scripts
